We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
RSS FeedTechnology

US court refuses to stay Samsung smartphone injunction


The court had on Monday declined to stay a preliminary injunction on Galaxy Tab 10.1

Article comments

A court in California denied Samsung on Tuesday a stay on a preliminary injunction against sales in the US of Samsung's Galaxy Nexus smartphone running Android, a day after the same court refused to stay a similar injunction against the sale of Samsung's tablet, the Galaxy Tab 10.1.

Samsung had filed a motion seeking to stay and suspend the preliminary injunction pending an appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, or, alternatively pending a decision by the Federal Circuit on stay pending appeal.

"Although some consumers may be disappointed that they cannot purchase the Galaxy Nexus, the Galaxy Nexus, as Samsung itself has repeatedly insisted, is not Samsung's only smartphone product on the market," Judge Lucy H. Koh of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division wrote in her 18-page order.

Samsung had argued that enjoining sales of the Galaxy Nexus will harm certain techie consumers who value the pure Android operating system offered in the Galaxy Nexus, and who will be unable to find any close substitute within the same price point as the Galaxy Nexus, according to the order.

The company said in a statement that it is disappointed as the court's ruling will restrict the choice of American consumers in the smartphone market. The company said it was currently working closely with Google to resolve the matter, as the patent in question concerns Google's unified search function. It added that it will continue to take all available measures, including legal action, to ensure that the Galaxy Nexus remains available to consumers.

Judge Koh issued an order on Friday enjoining Samsung and US subsidiaries from importing and selling in the US the "Galaxy Nexus smartphone and any product that is no more than colorably different from the specified product and infringes US Patent No. 8,086,604."

The patent, assigned to Apple, relates to an universal interface for the retrieval of information in a computer system.

Apple's complaint asserts a total of eight patents and identifies seventeen accused products, but it moved for a preliminary injunction only against the Galaxy Nexus smartphone, and on the basis of four patents, including the '604. The Judge said that Apple had shown that irreparable harm will be attributable to Samsung's alleged infringement of the '604 patent, though it had not shown the same with respect to Samsung's alleged infringement of the other three patents.

As a condition of the preliminary injunction, the court ordered plaintiff Apple to post a bond of US$95.6 million to secure payment of any damages sustained by Samsung if it is later found to have been wrongfully enjoined. Apple said in a filing Tuesday that it had posted the bond. The court had ordered Apple not to post the bond before it ruled on Samsung's motion to stay.

Share:

Comments

US court refuses to stay Samsung smartphone injunction
Technology

What does your perfect datacentre look like?

What does your perfect datacentre look like?

The financial impact of rising energy bills is a headache for companies toomore ..


iPhone sales drive strong Apple earnings

Apple's iPad shipments decline, but revenue and profit increasemore ..

Facebook sales leap as mobile ad business grows

Mobile ad sales comprised nearly 60% of the company's total ad salesmore ..

Raspberry Pi alternatives emerge to fill need for speed

The HummingBoard and $50 Banana Pi are faster alternatives to the popular $25 Raspberry Pi PCmore ..

What UK business needs to do now with big data

In the final of a three-part series, we look at the potential for companies to become victims in the battle for big datamore ..

Ethical questions around big data

In the second of a three-part series, Pat Brans looks at the ethics of collecting 'big data'more ..

Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.



In Depth
Do you have what it takes to become a non-executive?

Do you have what it takes to become a non-executive?

The benefits of board service for CFOs more ..

In Depth
How M&A teams can create value by challenging the CEO

How M&A teams can create value by challenging the CEO

A typical “hold” period of nine to 18 months can generate increased sale value more ..

Advertisement

* *