We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
RSS FeedRisk

Xstrata pushes back shareholder vote giving Glencore more time

Unpopular retention deals for top executives also forced the miner to reschedule a meeting set for this week.

Article comments

Xstrata set a date of 7 September for its shareholders to vote on the planned Glencore takeover, giving the commodities trader more time to hammer out a deal with a rival shareholder.

The FTSE100 miner pushed back the voting date after changes to unpopular retention deals for top executives forced it to reschedule a meeting set for this week.

A new date had been expected after deals to tie in Xstrata's top managers were overhauled at the end of last month, following shareholder backlash over mostly non-performance related cash packages.

But a vote on 7 September, later than strictly required, will also give Glencore, Xstrata's largest investor, six more weeks to agree a deal over the terms of the takeover with shareholder Qatar Holding, which is demanding better terms - easing speculation that the current deadlock between the two could put the tie-up on ice.

While the September date is still moveable, sources familiar with the matter and analysts said it marked a deadline of sorts and a goal for the talks between Glencore and Qatar's sovereign wealth fund, which owns 11 percent of the miner.

Qatar, which has built the second-largest stake in the miner, said last week it was firm in its demand for Glencore to improve its offer to 3.25 new Glencore shares for every Xstrata share held, up from the 2.8 on offer.

Glencore, for its part, has indicated it could walk away.

Under takeover rules, Glencore has until two weeks before the vote date to alter the terms of its offer - a later move is possible but would push the date back again.

Xstrata - which was caught in a "shareholder spring" that has seen investor protest over pay across sectors - said on Wednesday its new retention packages for top executives would be in shares only and be dependent on executives reaching a further $300 million of cost savings beyond planned synergies.

Xstrata also said it continued to expect the merger to complete in the fourth quarter.


Recommended Articles


Xstrata pushes back shareholder vote giving Glencore more time

How Nokia helped and hindered Microsoft's earnings

How Nokia helped and hindered Microsoft's earnings

The Nokia Devices and Services business helped boost Microsoft's revenue, but hurt profitsmore ..

Fraudsters get younger as tech savvy youth fund extravagant lifestyles

“Youth doesn’t always equal innocence” says KPMG fraud expertmore ..

UK profit warnings hit a three-year high

Rising competition, pricing pressures and the pound’s rise were to blame for reducing corporate profits, EY saidmore ..

SEC drops probe into Facebook's pre-IPO sales disclosures

The agency told Facebook that no enforcement action will be taken, the company said in a filingmore ..

Can shaky cyber security scupper an M&A deal?

In M&A a cyber attack on a target company could have a material impact on its valuemore ..

Why CFOs are changing their thinking on sustainability

Pernod Ricard CFO Gilles Bogaert has nailed his 'green' colours to the mastmore ..

Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:

PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

In Depth
Can finance rise to the challenge of major transformation?

Can finance rise to the challenge of major transformation?

Outdated finance processes, systems and competencies leave too many questions unanswered more ..

In Depth
Interim CFO or consultant? The pros and cons

Interim CFO or consultant? The pros and cons

Ed Harding offers an insight into the life of an interim CFO and the advantages in driving transformation more ..


* *