We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
RSS FeedRisk

Executives question SFO appetite for enforcement


Business re-examine investment in compliance

Article comments

Executives are re-examining investment in compliance after doubts grow over the Serious Fraud Office’s appetite for enforcing the new anti-bribery laws because of a lack of prosecutions, new research showed on Sunday.

A year on since the UK Bribery Act – considered to be some of the toughest anti-corruption laws in the world – came into force and just over a quarter of executives polled by Ernst & Young think the SFO are willing to prosecute bribery and corruption cases.

Ahead of the Bribery Act coming into law on 1 July 2011 the former head of the SFO Richard Alderman warned companies that the fraud squad would come down hard on them if they suspected corruption.

But, Jonathan Middup, UK head of Ernst & Young’s anti-bribery corruption team, said “a year without a corporate prosecution has left some feeling like it’s a phoney war”.

Five cases of bribery and corruption against UK companies were completed under the old laws, according to Ernst & Young’s UK Bribery digest, although there have been no prosecutions under the new Act.

Despite attention focusing on the fight against foreign bribery and corruption risks, EY’s analysis showed that four of tho five completed cases involved UK corruption in ‘business-to-business’ bribery.

EY said “this is despite a perception among UK executives that bribery and corruption rarely happens on home soil”.

“The cases we have seen clearly show that bribery and corruption is happening on home soil, that private sector bribery is a major risk for companies, and that individuals are exposed,” Middup said.

Last month the fraud agency abandoned its long-running probe into property tycoon Vincent Tchenguiz, bringing to an ignominious end an error-strewn investigation that has dented the SFO’s reputation. The decision to drop the case came less than a month after David Green, the SFO’s new director, took up his role.

Read also:

The Editor's blog - Bribery Act could deliver an "unpleasant surprise"

Interview with former SFO chief Richard Alderman

Share:

Comments

Executives question SFO appetite for enforcement
Risk

Hidden risks in the supply chain

Hidden risks in the supply chain

An unforeseen disaster can halt production and lead to share price falls and reputational damagemore ..


Taylor Wimpey CFO warns against UK withdrawal of EU

The group FD said "barriers would go up" and that would have an impact on Taylor Wimpeymore ..

RBS fined for IT failures after £25m trading losses

Hong Kong regulator fines bank £450,000more ..

Bank of England plans new round of cyber tests for banks

The Bank is to focus on individual banks’ security systemsmore ..

Energy risk: How data is eating up all the energy

Any failure in energy supplies to data servers can result in severe consequencesmore ..

Why BYOD needs to be on every CFO’s agenda

The Software Alliance explains why BYOD can be a legal nightmare for businessesmore ..

Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.



In Depth
Do you have what it takes to become a non-executive?

Do you have what it takes to become a non-executive?

The benefits of board service for CFOs more ..

In Depth
How M&A teams can create value by challenging the CEO

How M&A teams can create value by challenging the CEO

A typical “hold” period of nine to 18 months can generate increased sale value more ..

Advertisement

* *