We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
RSS FeedRisk

Experts issue risk guidance


Report offers advice on managing risk to help companies make strategic progress

Article comments

A team of experts have issued a report outlining their views on how company leaders should be implementing risk management strategies to better achieve their business objectives.

Choosing the right opportunities to work towards and mitigating the potential impact of identifiable challenges should be the basis of any risk appetite agenda, the Institute of Risk Management (IRM) maintains.

Refining policies in this context is crucial for any corproate strategy and plays a major part in overall business development, the institute suggests in a report backed by a range of other influential bodies, including the chartered institutes of both management accountants and internal auditors.

IRM said its guidance was drawn up in part because of the explicit requirement for board member to understand the nature and extent of the risks their organisations face under the terms of the UK Corporate Governance Code.

“We think we have managed to outline a process which should be proportionate to an organisation's risk management maturity, capability and culture and, most importantly, supported by appropriate data,” said the report’s main author and IRM deputy chairman Richard Anderson.

“Nevertheless, we do not think that this is the last word on the subject in such a fast-moving environment and we are extremely interested in receiving feedback on this work,” he added.

Anderson emphasised the importance that appropriate leadership on risk management can have as corporate boards aim for sustainable and long-term value creation. For not-for-profit organisations improved risk management “will result in better social outcomes,” he said.

Share:

Comments

Michael Muramuzi (ACCA) said: The picture portrayed by auditors is a rosy one for fear of loosing clientele and possible reputation I think corporations should be forced to change auditors after a period of three year because of the threats to Independence caused by long stay of auditorsEfforts should be made by legislators in ensuring utmost competition and development of smaller firms in audit work market Big firms appear to have lost it although not enough is being discussed about them

Experts issue risk guidance
Risk

Hidden risks in the supply chain

Hidden risks in the supply chain

An unforeseen disaster can halt production and lead to share price falls and reputational damagemore ..


Taylor Wimpey CFO warns against UK withdrawal of EU

The group FD said "barriers would go up" and that would have an impact on Taylor Wimpeymore ..

RBS fined for IT failures after £25m trading losses

Hong Kong regulator fines bank £450,000more ..

Bank of England plans new round of cyber tests for banks

The Bank is to focus on individual banks’ security systemsmore ..

Energy risk: How data is eating up all the energy

Any failure in energy supplies to data servers can result in severe consequencesmore ..

Why BYOD needs to be on every CFO’s agenda

The Software Alliance explains why BYOD can be a legal nightmare for businessesmore ..

Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.



In Depth
Do you have what it takes to become a non-executive?

Do you have what it takes to become a non-executive?

The benefits of board service for CFOs more ..

In Depth
How M&A teams can create value by challenging the CEO

How M&A teams can create value by challenging the CEO

A typical “hold” period of nine to 18 months can generate increased sale value more ..

Advertisement

* *