We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
RSS FeedRisk

Experts issue risk guidance


Report offers advice on managing risk to help companies make strategic progress

Article comments

A team of experts have issued a report outlining their views on how company leaders should be implementing risk management strategies to better achieve their business objectives.

Choosing the right opportunities to work towards and mitigating the potential impact of identifiable challenges should be the basis of any risk appetite agenda, the Institute of Risk Management (IRM) maintains.

Refining policies in this context is crucial for any corproate strategy and plays a major part in overall business development, the institute suggests in a report backed by a range of other influential bodies, including the chartered institutes of both management accountants and internal auditors.

IRM said its guidance was drawn up in part because of the explicit requirement for board member to understand the nature and extent of the risks their organisations face under the terms of the UK Corporate Governance Code.

“We think we have managed to outline a process which should be proportionate to an organisation's risk management maturity, capability and culture and, most importantly, supported by appropriate data,” said the report’s main author and IRM deputy chairman Richard Anderson.

“Nevertheless, we do not think that this is the last word on the subject in such a fast-moving environment and we are extremely interested in receiving feedback on this work,” he added.

Anderson emphasised the importance that appropriate leadership on risk management can have as corporate boards aim for sustainable and long-term value creation. For not-for-profit organisations improved risk management “will result in better social outcomes,” he said.

Share:

Comments

Michael Muramuzi (ACCA) said: The picture portrayed by auditors is a rosy one for fear of loosing clientele and possible reputation I think corporations should be forced to change auditors after a period of three year because of the threats to Independence caused by long stay of auditorsEfforts should be made by legislators in ensuring utmost competition and development of smaller firms in audit work market Big firms appear to have lost it although not enough is being discussed about them

Experts issue risk guidance
Risk

Energy risk: How data is eating up all the energy

Energy risk: How data is eating up all the energy

Any failure in energy supplies to data servers can result in severe consequencesmore ..


EMEA corporate upgrades outnumber downgrades, says Moody’s

Rating agency notes first such instance since the financial crisis yearsmore ..

World hit by record wave of 'mega' data breaches in 2013

Over half a billion records compromisedmore ..

CFOs bullish on UK growth prospects

Finance chiefs' appetite for risk has doubled that of a year agomore ..

Why BYOD needs to be on every CFO’s agenda

The Software Alliance explains why BYOD can be a legal nightmare for businessesmore ..

Audits key to managing cyber risks

Cybersecurity controls and reporting procedures should be assessed annuallymore ..

Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.



In Depth
How M&A teams can create value by challenging the CEO

How M&A teams can create value by challenging the CEO

A typical “hold” period of nine to 18 months can generate increased sale value more ..

In Depth
What every company needs to do about big data?

What every company needs to do about big data?

In the first of a three part series, Pat Brans explores just how big 'big data' will get? more ..

Advertisement

* *