We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
RSS FeedGovernance

SAC Capital in US$614mn settlement with regulators

Hedge fund settles US charges related to insider trading

Article comments

Hedge fund SAC Capital has agreed to pay a record US$614 million (£406.7 million) to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as a settlement towards charges of insider trading.

However, the fund, managed by Wall Street heavyweight Steve Cohen, did not admit or deny the charges. The settlement was related to former trader Mathew Martoma, who stands accused of profiting from secret information about a drug trial being conducted by a pharmaceutical firm based on a tip-off he had received from a doctor, before the information was made public.

Martoma then allegedly shared the information with SAC Capital affiliates and sold US$960 million worth of shares in Elan & Wyeth, the company that made the drug. He is facing a criminal trial and has pleaded not guilty.

SAC Capital also stood accused of a separate incident at its Sigma Capital affiliate for insider trading in the shares of technology firms Dell and Nvidia. It is thought that US$600 million and US$14 million were allocated to the Martoma and Sigma Capital incidents respectively.

The SEC said, "The settlement does not preclude any such charges against any person, including Steve Cohen. We can't tolerate a market rigged for the benefit of insiders and their cronies."

SAC Capital manages a hedge fund worth US$15 billion. In a statement, it said, "This settlement is a substantial step toward resolving all outstanding regulatory matters and allows the firm to move forward with confidence. We are committed to continuing to maintain a first-rate compliance effort woven into the fabric of the firm."



SAC Capital in US$614mn settlement with regulators

What makes a good board report?

What makes a good board report?

Examining how CFOs can improve the way they report back to the boardmore ..

FRC consults on governance code

The watchdog is looking at clawback clauses among other governance issuesmore ..

Review to blame weak governance at Co-op bank

The Kelly Review will pinpoint the Britannia building society takeover as the main problem at the bank, the BBC claimsmore ..

Vince Cable plans to unmask hidden company owners

A public register of company owners will be created whichpolice and tax authorities can usemore ..

Examining the issue of corporate litigation funding

Litigation funding is a very useful tool for CFOs but not a panacea for all legal mattersmore ..

Corporate governance: A catalyst for innovation

Corporate governance is a powerful tool in a C-suite executive’s arsenalmore ..

Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:

PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.

In Depth
Do you have what it takes to become a non-executive?

Do you have what it takes to become a non-executive?

The benefits of board service for CFOs more ..

In Depth
How M&A teams can create value by challenging the CEO

How M&A teams can create value by challenging the CEO

A typical “hold” period of nine to 18 months can generate increased sale value more ..


* *