We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. If you continue to use this site, we'll assume you're happy with this. Alternatively, click here to find out how to manage these cookies

hide cookie message
RSS FeedGovernance

US spies given go-ahead to share data with companies


Privacy advocates concerned over threat to personal data

Article comments

The US House of Representatives Intelligence Committee has approved a recently introduced bill that would allow greater cyberthreat information sharing between intelligence agencies and private companies, even though privacy advocates say it would allow those agencies to spy on US residents.

The committee approved the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act late Thursday by a 17-1 vote. The bill would allow intelligence agencies to share classified cyberthreat information with approved US companies, while encouraging companies to share their own information with the government or other companies.

The next step for the bill is a vote in the full House. That vote has not yet been scheduled.

The bill will protect privacy, said commitee chairman Representative Mike Rogers. "The decisiveness of the vote shows the tremendous bipartisan support for this bill," he said. "Through hard work and compromise we have struck a delicate balance that provides strong protections for privacy and civil liberties, while still enabling effective cyber threat sharing and providing clear authority for the private sector to defend its own networks."

The bill would help protect businesses from cyberespionage, Rogers said.

Information sharing is a good goal, but the bill goes too far, said Jim Dempsey, vice president of public policy for the Center for Democracy and Technology. The bill could give the National Security Agency new access to personal information held by US companies, given the legislation's broad definition of the kind of information that companies can share with the NSA and other government agencies, he said.

The bill allows companies to share any information pertaining to the protection of information systems, Dempsey said. That "potentially could be all traffic," he said.

The bill, although it says information sharing with the government is voluntary, could also allow the NSA to demand that private companies share their information in exchange for the cyber threat information the agency has, Dempsey said. "It creates an incentive structure as to who gets the NSA's secret sauce," he said. "We're afraid that the NSA would use that, basically, as a trading card. They would say, 'We'll give you our good stuff, if you give us a lot of your good stuff.'"

The bill would also shift responsibility for cybersecurity from private industry to the government, and from civilian agencies within the government to intelligence and military agencies, Dempsey said. "We think the government should not be involved in monitoring the private sector networks," he said.

Bill sponsors Rogers and Representative C.A. "Dutch" Ruppersberger introduced an amendment, approved by the committee, designed to limit government agencies' use of information they get from private companies.

The amendment prohibits the government from using cyberthreat information unless at least one significant purpose is cybersecurity or national security. It also prohibits the government from searching through any cyberthreat information it receives from the private sector for any purposes not authorised by the bill.

Share:

Recommended Articles

Comments

US spies given go-ahead to share data with companies
Governance

What’s going to kill your company?

What’s going to kill your company?

The role of the CFO and the board in strategic risk governancemore ..


Microsoft removes Bing image widget after Getty lawsuit

The company is being sued by Getty Images for copyright infringementmore ..

Apple loses bid for sales ban in Samsung patent case

Apple failed to show that it suffered enough harm as a result of Samsung's infringementmore ..

Steatite wins MoJ's electronic tagging contract worth £76.5m

Serco and G4S lost the contract after overcharging scandalmore ..

What makes a good board report?

Examining how CFOs can improve the way they report back to the boardmore ..

Examining the issue of corporate litigation funding

Litigation funding is a very useful tool for CFOs but not a panacea for all legal mattersmore ..

Send to a friend

Email this article to a friend or colleague:


PLEASE NOTE: Your name is used only to let the recipient know who sent the story, and in case of transmission error. Both your name and the recipient's name and address will not be used for any other purpose.



In Depth
Can finance rise to the challenge of major transformation?

Can finance rise to the challenge of major transformation?

Outdated finance processes, systems and competencies leave too many questions unanswered more ..

In Depth
Interim CFO or consultant? The pros and cons

Interim CFO or consultant? The pros and cons

Ed Harding offers an insight into the life of an interim CFO and the advantages in driving transformation more ..

Advertisement

* *